Advertisement

Posted: Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:00 AM



Content ImageContent Image

Matthew Weaver/Capital Press

Environmental Protection Agency on-scene coordinator Greg Weigel, of Boise, Idaho, delivers his presentation on the requirements for a spill prevention plan May 15 in Ritzville, Wash.



Advertisement




EPA pushes spill prevention

Federal agency: 'We're not targeting farm facilities'

By MATTHEW WEAVER

Capital Press

RITZVILLE, Wash. -- The Environmental Protection Agency is advising farmers to use common sense when considering whether their farm meets requirements for a fuel spill prevention plan.

"If you lost the entire contents of any single tank, where would it go?" said EPA on-scene coordinator Greg Weigel of Boise. "Look at the topography, the natural grade on your site, direct drainage and see if there's a reasonable likelihood that the worst-case scenario could get into the water."

He advised against automatically assuming a farm is regulated by the EPA. If a farmer determines it's not, he should document the reasoning, he said, noting there's no registration requirement.

"We're not targeting farm facilities," Weigel said. "If we were to come out to your facility because of a spill or we've received a complaint, certainly we expect you to be in compliance. If you're not, then there's consequences."

The EPA is more concerned about large bulk distributors, Weigel said.

Farmers must have a spill prevention, control and countermeasure (SPCC) plan if they can store more than 1,320 gallons of fuel above ground or have underground storage tanks larger than 42,000 gallons.

If they have a storage capacity of more than 10,000 gallons, a professional engineer needs to certify the plan. If less, they can use a short form to create and certify a plan.

Ritzville farmer Paul Simonson said he has to build some containment around his tanks.

"It's just the point I have to comply with regulations -- it's going to be an added expense," Simonson said, estimating the plan and changes will cost him $10,000. "It's just more regulations on us we have to put up with. We can't pass our expenses off to our customers."

Creston, Wash., farmer Loren Houger has a spill control plan.

"I really honestly think people should consider protecting their investment as much as the environment," he said. "Fuel costs the way they are, why wouldn't you invest a few thousand dollars to protect it? If you did have a spill, you should be able to recover a good portion of that."

Online

www.epa.gov/emergencies/content/spcc/spcc_ag.htm

Comments made about this article

Comment on this article

You must LOGIN to post comments

Advertisement

Copyright © 2009-2013 Capital Press, MediaSpan and The Associated Press where indicated. All rights reserved.

Contact Capital Press at 1-800-882-6789 or click here to find our staff listing.

Site optimized for use with Firefox browser, Ver. 16.0.1

Privacy Policies: Capital Press | MediaSpan Online Services

Other Capital Press websites:

Capital Press | OnlyAg.com | Ag Ads Now | Farm Seller | Ag Directory West | Blogriculture agriculture blog and podcasts

Our sister EO Media Group websites:

The Daily Astorian | Coast Weekend | AstoriaRocks.com | Chinook Observer
Oregon Coast Today | Seaside-Sun.com| Seaside Signal| Cannon Beach Gazette
Coast River Business Journal
Hermiston Herald | East Oregonian | Eastern Oregon Real Estate | EO Marketplace
Blue Mountain Eagle | Wallowa County Chieftain